Deepak Kumar Gupta @ Deepak Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84751 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-232 Year-2022 Thana- ROHTAS COMPLAINT CASE DistrictRohtas ====================================================== Deepak Kumar Gupta @ Deepak Sah Son of Singhasan Sao Resident of Village - Kevadhi, P.O. and P.S. - Kudra, District - Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Rekha Devi Wife of Deepak Kumar Gupta @ Deepak Sah, Daugher of Vikash Sah Resident of Village - Kevadhi, P.O. and P.S. - Kudra, District - Rohtas. At present Resident of Village and P.O. - Karwandiya, P.S. - Sasaram Muffassil, District - Rohtas ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Siddharth Harsh, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Gauri Shankar Gupta, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 16-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. No one appears on behalf of OP.No.2 despite issuance of notice.

2. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and section 3⁄4 of the D.P.Act.

3. The case is one under section 498A and the petitioner is husband. The complaint case discloses an allegation of demand of dowry and torture.

4. The matter had earlier been sent to the Mediation Center for resolution of disputes but the same had failed.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84751 of 2024(4) dt.16-07-2025 2/2

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegations made in the complaint is not correct and as a matter of fact, the marriage had taken place in the year 2019 as according to her statement also she left the house on 10.03.2021. The present complaint case has been filed on 14.03.2022 that is after lapse of one year.

6. The learned counsel for the O.P.No. 2 however opposes the prayer for bail.

7. Considering all the above mentioned facts and circumstances, I am inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, in the event of his arrest/ surrender within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/ successor court in Complaint case no. 232 of 2022, subject to condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.PC and subject to the further condition that the petitioner shall co-operate in investigation/ trial.

(Soni Shrivastava, J) N.K/- U T