Patna High CourtCR. MISC./84409/2023bail rejected

Meh Uddin v. The State Of Bihar

2024-01-10Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84409 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-283 Year-2023 Thana- PALASI District- Araria ====================================================== Meh Uddin S/O LATE KARKHUDDIN R/O VILL-PIPRA BIJWAR WARD NO N7, P/S PALASI , DIST- ARARIA.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mukesh Rana, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shyam Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 10-01-2024 No one appeared on behalf of the petitioner. However, learned A.P.P. for the State is present.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Palasi P.S. Case No. 283 of 2023 registered on 08.09.2023 lodged under Sections 341, 323, 498A, 324, 307, 354B, 379, 504/34 of the I.P.C. and 3⁄4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, F.I.R. has been lodged against six named accused persons including the petitioner. It transpires from the F.I.R. that the petitioner is aged about 52 years and is father-in-law. The statement of settlement is there, but general and omnibus allegation of giving poison is made on the entire family members and also to assault the informant by

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84409 of 2023(2) dt.10-01-2024 2/2 rod on her head.

4. The allegation of outrage of modesty is against the bother-in-law and husband and not on father-in-law and it is clear from records that petitioner is in custody since 11.10.2023 having clean antecedent.

5. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

7. Counsel for the informant vehemently opposes the prayer for bail and submits that entire family members has committed the said crime and involvement of petitioner is also there. Counsel for the informant further submits that there is specific allegation against the petitioner that he has assaulted the informant by iron rod, supported by injury.

9. In the present facts and circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner but liberty is hereby granted to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge and Trial Court is directed to release the petitioner on bail imposing its own conditions, so that he may not evade his appearance during trial.

(Dr. Anshuman, J) Sunnykr/- U