Bansi Chaudhary @ Banshi Choudhari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.524 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-461 Year-2023 Thana- HARSIDHI District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.

Bansi Chaudhary @ Banshi Choudhari Son Of Late Ramswaroop Chaudhary Resident Of Village- Math Lohiyar Bhagtaha Tola, Ps- Harsidhi, Dist- East Champaran 2.

Bachcha Chaudhary @ Bachchu Chaudhary Son Of Bansi Chaudhary @ Banshi Choudhari Resident Of Village- Math Lohiyar Bhagtaha Tola, PsHarsidhi, Dist- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Vinod Shanker Modi ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 16-01-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners have prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 324, 326, 307, 354(B), 379, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The allegation against the petitioners along with others is of assaulting the informant and his family members due to which they sustained injury. It is further alleged that the accused persons also outraged the modesty to the informant's family.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case due to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.524 of 2024(2) dt.16-01-2024 2/2 dirty village politics. They have committed no offence. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners rather the specific allegation against co-accused Mantu Chaudhary, who assaulted by means of farsa to the informant's brother, due to which he sustained injury. There is no specific overt act against these petitioners. Petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail petition. They are languishing in judicial custody since 19.07.2023.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, East Champaran/concerned Court in connection with Harsidhi P.S. Case No. 461 of 2023.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Arish/- U T