Sunil Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.23938 of 2019 ====================================================== Sunil Kumar Son of Late Shri Krishna, Resident of MIG- 250, Lohia Nagar, Kankarbagh, P.S.- Kankarbagh, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Secretary, Bihar School Examination Board, Patna. 3.
The Deputy Secretary, Bihar School Examination Board, Patna. 4.
The Under Secretary cum Deputy Director Administration, Education Department, Bihar, Patna.
5.
The Director (Administration) Cum Additional Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
6.
The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ranjeet Kumar For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Smt. Binita Singh (SC28) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 03-12-2019 Heard both sides.
The petitioner seeks relief that the petitioner was allowed benefit of 2nd M.A.C.P. with effect from 01.01.2009 but the monetary benefit of 2nd M.A.C.P. was given to the petitioner with effect from 06.08.2014 although the petitioner is entitled to get the monetary benefit with effect from 01.07.2009 till his retirement on 31.05.2019.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has already filed representation before the Director(Administration)-cum-Additional Secretary, Education
Patna High Court CWJC No.23938 of 2019(2) dt.03-12-2019 2/2 Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna and the same is still pending. I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the Director(Administration)-cum-Additional Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna to look into the representation of the petitioner and if the petitioner was granted 2nd M.A.C.P. with effect from 01.01.2009, the petitioner is entitled to get monetary benefit from the date of conferring M.A.C.P. to the petitioner but the monetary benefit was extended to the petitioner only with effect from 06.08.2014 and dispose of the representation of the petitioner within four months from the date of receipt of this order. With the aforesaid direction, this writ petition is disposed of.
(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) Saurabh/- U