← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./85357/2023allowed

Jamunia Khatoon @ Jaimun Khatoon v. The State Of Bihar

2024-01-16Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85357 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-87 Year-2021 Thana- PURAINI District- Madhepura ====================================================== JAMUNIA KHATOON @ JAIMUN KHATOON DAUGHTER OF MD. SALAM @ SEKH SALAM, WIFE OF MD. JAKIR RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - SARPARDAH JALAL TOLA, P.S. - PURAINI, DISTRICT - MADHEPURA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Uday Chand Prasad, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Aslam Ansari, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 16-01-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends her arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 325, 326, 307, 354, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Allegedly, all the FIR named accused persons including the petitioner are said to have assaulted the informant's side with deadly weapons due to which they sustained several injuries.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. No such occurrence as alleged ever took place. She has been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85357 of 2023(2) dt.16-01-2024 2/2 falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. There is case and counter case between the parties. Some of the injured persons have sustained grievous injuries, but this petitioner is not the author of those grievous injuries. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

5. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, as there is no specific overt act against the petitioner and she is a lady, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Puraini P.S. Case No. 87 of 2021, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T