Dhananjay Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10940 of 2018 ====================================================== Dhananjay Singh, Son of Madan Singh, Resident of - 03, Jhabar, Dipka, Police Station- Deepka, District- Korba (Chhatisgarh), at present C/o Sunil Kashyap, Takhatpur, Police Station- Limhi, District- Bilaspur (Chhatisgarh). ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Excise, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2. The District Magistrate, Siwan.
3. The Superintendent of Police, Siwan.
4. The Officer in Charge, Mairwa, Police Station, District- Siwan. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Kumar Manish- SC 5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 20-06-2018 Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we direct that pending finalization of the criminal case (Mairwa P.S. Case No.160 of 2018), vehicle of the petitioner (Wagon R VXI bearing Registration No.CG10W 5162) be released to the petitioner on the petitioner furnishing two sureties to the satisfaction of the District Magistrate, Siwan. In case, respondents want to take action for confiscation, they are cautioned to take note of Section 56 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 and shall initiate proceedings only if the confiscation proceedings can be initiated in a case like this where there is no seizure of liquor and the
Patna High Court CWJC No.10940 of 2018(2) dt.20-06-2018 2/2 vehicle is not used for transportation of liquor and only the driver is found to have driven the vehicle in a drunken condition. In case confiscation proceedings are initiated and finally it is found that the confiscation could not be initiated being contrary to Section 56 of the Act, the petitioner shall have liberty to seek compensation to be paid by the officer concerned personally who takes action in the matter.
With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of.
(Rajendra Menon, CJ) ( Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Sunil/- U