Srikant Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75962 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-72 Year-2015 Thana- RAGHOPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Srikant Rai, Son of Shankar Rai, Resident of Village- Chandpura, P.O. Chandpura, P.S.- Raghopur, District- Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shantanu Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 26-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner in this case is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Raghopur P.S. Case No.72 of 2015 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case due to previous enmity and land dispute. Learned counsel further submits that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner.

Learned APP for the State is present and has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75962 of 2019(2) dt.26-11-2019 2/3 Considering the facts and circumstances of the case wherein it is the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner and save and except general and omnibus allegation of being a member of mob, no other material is there against the petitioner to connect him with the present case and that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing of bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (fifteen thousand ) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-IV, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Raghopur P.S. Case No.72 of 2015, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. i.e.

(i) a condition that the person shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

(ii) a condition that the person shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75962 of 2019(2) dt.26-11-2019 3/3 (iii) a condition that the person shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) arvind/- U T