← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./82878/2025bail granted

Guddu Yadav @ Ganesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2025-12-03Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82878 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-398 Year-2025 Thana- AMAUR District- Purnia ====================================================== Guddu Yadav @ Ganesh yadav Son of Fagu Yadav Village- Nitendra PS -Amour District-Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dheeraj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Kumar Ranjit Ranjan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 03-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Amour PS Case No. 398 of 2025 instituted for the offences under Section/s 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. 3.

The prosecution case, in short, is that 162.480 liters liquor was recovered from Bolero car.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. It is submitted that petitioner is neither the owner nor the driver of the vehicle

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82878 of 2025(2) dt.03-12-2025 2/2 in question and his name has surfaced in this case on the disclosure made by apprehended co-accused. The petitioner is in custody since 23.09.2025 and has got no criminal antecedent/s. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the BNSS, 2023. 5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 6.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, clean antecedent of the petitioner and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7.

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.15,000/- (Fifteen thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Amour PS Case No. 398 of 2025.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Kishore/- U T