Lalji Chaudhary @ Laljit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80919 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-170 Year-2025 Thana- NASRIGANJ District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.

Lalji Chaudhary @ Laljit Kumar Son of Krishna Chaudhary R/o Village - Sabadla, P.S. - Nasariganj, Dist. - Rohtas.

2.

Bittu Kumar Son of Badan Singh R/o Village - Sabadla, P.S. - Nasariganj, Dist. - Rohtas.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Lakshmi Kant Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 11-12-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners seek bail in anticipation of their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) of the Excise Act.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner no.1 has antecedent of one case and petitioner no.2 has antecedent of two cases and the allegation is of recovery of 45 litres of liquor from a plastic sack.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners were not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was recovered from their conscious possession and even alleged

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80919 of 2025(2) dt.11-12-2025 2/3 recovery is from a place, which does not belong to the petitioners and they came to be implicated at the instance of Chaukidar with whom they are on an inimical term.

5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners, above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on provisional anticipatory bail on their furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/ successor Court in connection with Nasariganj P. S. Case No.170 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

7. The application stands allowed.

8. It is made clear that the learned trial Court after accepting the provisional bail bonds of the petitioners shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioners and in the event, if it is found that petitioner no.1 has antecedent of more than one case and petitioner no.2 has antecedent of more than two cases, then it would be presumed that petitioners for the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80919 of 2025(2) dt.11-12-2025 3/3 purposes of obtaining anticipatory bail had concealed their antecedent before this Court, in that event, the present provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed, but if on verification, it is found that petitioner no.1 has antecedent of one case only and petitioner no.2 has antecedent of two cases only, in that event, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T