Rajeshwar Prasad v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80877 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-374 Year-2025 Thana- HARSIDHI District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.
Rajeshwar Prasad S/O Baijnath Prasad @ Baidhnath Prasad Resident of Village - Kanchhedwa Ward No. 02, P.S. - Harsidhi, District - East Champaran 2.
Dilip Kumar Son of Jagdish Prasad Resident of Village - Kanchhedwa Ward No. 02, P.S. - Harsidhi, District - East Champaran 3.
Ramlakhan Prasad @ Ram Lakhan Prasad Kushwaha Son of Shivnath Prasad. Resident of Village - Kanchhedwa Ward No. 02, P.S. - Harsidhi, District - East Champaran 4.
Harendra Prasad Son of Rudal Prasad. Resident of Village - Kanchhedwa Ward No. 02, P.S. - Harsidhi, District - East Champaran 5.
Chhotelal Prasad @ Chhote Lal Prasad @ Chhotan Son of Late Shivnath Prasad. Resident of Village - Kanchhedwa Ward No. 02, P.S. - Harsidhi, District - East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Madhurendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Yogendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 10-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Harsidhi P.S. Case No. 374 of 2025 registered for the offence under Sections 115(2), 117(2), 118(1), 126(2), 109, 351, 352, 3(5) of the BNS, 2023.
3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioners are said to have assaulted the victim.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80877 of 2025(4) dt.10-03-2026 2/2
4. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are innocent and they have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that in the counter blast case, one person of the petitioner side has been killed by the prosecution.
5. Considering the aforesaid facts, this application is allowed.
6. Let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the concerned Court below within four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, East Champaran, Motihari/concerned Court below in connection with Harsidhi P.S. Case No. 374 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 / Section 482 of the BNSS.
(Sandeep Kumar, J) Vikas/- U