← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./86277/2023allowed

Ranjay Bind @ Ranjit Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2024-01-11Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86277 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-70 Year-2022 Thana- MARANCHI District- Patna ====================================================== Ranjay Bind @ Ranjit Singh Son of Late Asharfi Bind R/o Village- Dumra Diyara Janjira, P.S.-Maranchi, District-Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Kashyap For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Mushtaque Alam ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 11-01-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has filed the instant application for grant of regular bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

3. The prosecution case relates to recovery of one country made Masket near the house of the petitioner.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in the present case due to village politics. He has no concern with alleged arm which was seized by the police. Neither the petitioner was arrested on the spot nor any incriminating article has been recovered from his conscious possession. Both the seizure list witness are police personnel

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86277 of 2023(2) dt.11-01-2024 2/2 which is complete violation of Section 100 of Cr.P.C. The petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 11.08.2023.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for Bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail after framing of charge, if not framed. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Maranchi P.S. Case No.70 of 2022 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. 1st Class, Barh, Patna.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) lata/- U T