Suresh Sah v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.81477 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-210 Year-2024 Thana- TURKAULIYA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Suresh Sah S/o Ramchandra Sah Resident of village- Mahnawa Bazar (Belwa Tiwari tola), P.S-Turkauliya, District- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 12-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 308, 354, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that accused persons including the petitioner on 27.03.2024 at 02:00 p.m. came to her house and started abusing, on objection, Ram Chandra Sah ordered to kill. Thereafter, Rupesh Sah assaulted her and dashed her on the ground and petitioner assaulted Bhim Sah with farsa causing injury on head, who intervened to save her and also assaulted Antima Devi by bamboo causing fracture of left hand finger.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81477 of 2025(2) dt.12-01-2026 2/2 petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that from perusal of the FIR, it would manifest that the date of occurrence is 27.03.2024 and the FIR came to be instituted on 07.04.2024, i.e., after a delay of 12 days without any plausible explanation of delay which casts an aspersion on the case of the prosecution.
5. Learned APP for the State opposes the anticipatory bail application.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and taking into consideration the fact that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent, let petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Turkauliya P.S. Case No.210 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Sanjay/- U T