← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/2152/2018disposed

Pramod Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-09-20Mr. Justice Dinesh Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2152 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2322 of 2018 ====================================================== Pramod Kumar Yadav son of Sri Mukhlal Yadav, resident of Village- Pakri Dikshit, P.S.- Kalyanpur, District- East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar and Ors 2.

Sri Raman Kumar, The District Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari. 3.

Sri Raman Kumar, The District Arms Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari. null null 4.

Sri Upendra Kr. Sharma, The Superintendent of Police, East Champaran at Motihari.

5.

Sri Sanjay Kr. Singh, The Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Chakioya, East Champaran at Motihari.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rakesh Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. P.K.Verma, AAG-3 Mr. Dr. Mankeshwar Tiwari, AC to AAG-3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-09-2019 The present application has been filed for initiation of a proceeding of contempt for willful and deliberate violation of the order dated 23.03.2018 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 2322 of 2018, whereby the District Magistrate, East Champaran was directed to dispose of the application of the petitioner submitted for grant of licence of rifle within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of the order. However, the District Magistrate has passed the order after the stipulated period of four weeks. The District Magistrate vide order

Patna High Court MJC No.2152 of 2018(3) dt.20-09-2019 2/2 12.06.2018 passed in Misc. Case No. 54 of 2018 has rejected the application of the petitioner, as contained in Annexure-A to show cause filed on behalf of opposite party no. 2. In the circumstances, this Court finds no reason to further proceed in the matter. However, if the petitioner is aggrieved with the order passed by the District Magistrate, East Champaran, he is at liberty, if so advised, to file appeal before appropriate forum.

Accordingly, this application is disposed of. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) DKS/- U