Patna High CourtCR. MISC./85696/2023dismissed

Chandan Singh @ Tiger Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2024-01-16Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85696 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-218 Year-2023 Thana- DARAUNDA District- Siwan ====================================================== Chandan Singh @ Tiger Singh S/O Shri Ram Singh R/O Village- Dibbi, P.SM.H. Nagar, Distt.- Siwan. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bijay Prakash Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 16-01-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Daraunda (M.H. Nagar) P.S. Case No. 218 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 386, 387, 307, 120(B), 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Siwan.

3. As per the prosecution case, allegation against the petitioner along with other co-accused persons is that they have fired upon the informant and also demanded extortion money.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85696 of 2023(2) dt.16-01-2024 2/2 specific rather general and omnibus in nature. He submits that the petitioner has not demanded any extortion money. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mention in para-3 of this application.

5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposing the bail petition submitted that specific overt act has been attributed against the petitioner. Hence, he does not deserve privilege of anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of case and the nature of the offence, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) anand/- U T