Munna Kumar @ Munna Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86142 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-169 Year-2024 Thana- KARAKAT District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.

Munna Kumar @ Munna Paswan Son of Late Shiv Kumar Paswan Resident of Village- Chavar Dihri, PS- Karakat, District- Rohtas 2.

Lalbabu Paswan Son of Late Shiv Kumar Paswan Resident of VillageChavar Dihri, PS- Karakat, District- Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Nagendra Upadhyay, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shailendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 18-12-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Karakat P.S. Case No.169 of 2024 for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 354, 448 & 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Petitioners and others by entering into the house of the informant were teasing the daughter-in-law of the informant and when informant and his son forbade to do so they were assaulted by them due to which they sustained injury upon their head.

4. The petitioners are quite innocent and have been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86142 of 2024(2) dt.18-12-2024 2/2 falsely implicated in this case due to land disptue. The allegations levelled against the petitioners is general and omnibus in nature. It is further submitted that there is a small piece of land in front of the house of both the parties and they are making claim over the said land and for the said dispute a case is going on before the learned Court below. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

5. Per contra, learned APP for the State vehemently opposing the bail petition submitted that the allegations levelled against the petitioners is serious in nature, hence they do not deserve anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of case as well as the fact that the injury was found grievous in nature, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The prayer for bail of the petitioners is hereby rejected.

7. However, if the petitioners surrender before the learned Court below within six weeks from today and seek regular bail the learned Court below would pass order in accordance with law without being prejudiced by this order. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Trivedi/- U T