← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./86604/2024bail rejected

Sangeeta Devi @ Sangita Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2025-02-28Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86604 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-441 Year-2024 Thana- BIHAR District- Nalanda ====================================================== Sangeeta Devi @ Sangita Devi Wife of Late Pappu Chaudhary Resident of Village- Khairabad, PS- Biharsharif, District- Nalanda (Biharsharif) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1 .

The State of Bihar 2.

Bihar minerals (concession prevention of illegal mining transportation and storage) Department Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rita Verma, APP For Mines :

Mr. Naresh Dikshit , Spl. PP Mines Mr. Utsav Anand , Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 28-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, informant and the State .

2. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 147, 148 , 149, 341 , 323 , 324, 332, 333 , 307, 353 , 355 , 379, 411 , 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and u /s 27 of the Arms Act. 3 . The prosecution case in brief, is that on secret information, the informant, along with other police personnel, conducted a raid on 15.06.2024 at about 22:05 PM, and when they reached near the Goithwa river, they saw that soil and sand were transported by a JCB machine, 3 tractors were loaded with soil, and 8 tractors were empty. Thereafter, it is alleged that, on

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86604 of 2024(4) dt.28-02-2025 2/2 seeing the police party, all the accused persons attacked the police party in order to free the seized vehicles, due to which SHO Ramshankar Singh sustained injury. It is further alleged that the accused persons took away the seized vehicle, of which this petitioner is the registered owner.

4. Considering the fact that petitioner is owner of one of the seized vehicles which was involved in illegal mining of sand and other facts and circumstances of the case , prayer for pre - arrest bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Koushik/- U T