Patna High CourtCR. MISC./76581/2019dismissed

Arjun Kumar @ Ajurn Kumar @ Ajurn Rai v. The State Of Bihar

2019-12-11Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76581 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-639 Year-2019 Thana- SARAIYA District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Arjun Kumar @ Ajurn Kumar @ Ajurn Rai, Son of Ram Dev Rai, Resident of Village- Motipur, P.S.- Motipur, District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Jitendra Narain Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sucheta Yadav ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 11-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Petitioner in the present case is seeking regular bail in connection with Saraiya P.S. Case No. 639 of 2019 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 272, 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and nothing incriminating has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner is in custody since 23.09.2019 having no criminal antecedent. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76581 of 2019(2) dt.11-12-2019 2/2 Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, wherein it appears that the apprehended accused has not only disclosed the name of this petitioner as a trader of the illicit liquor, but has also disclosed the place where the petitioner and one other person were storing the illicit liquor from where the apprehended accused was getting liquor for sale and there being huge quantity of illicit liquor having been recovered, though the place may not be belonging to the petitioner, but the materials available on the record are such that this Court does not find it a fit case for grant of regular bail at this stage. The petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after a reasonable period. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) arvind/- U T