Super Mani Kumar @ Super Mani Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77326 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-293 Year-2019 Thana- BISFI District- Madhubani ====================================================== SUPER MANI KUMAR @ SUPER MANI SAH Son of Late Kari Sah @ Pradeep Sah Resident of Village- Navtoli, P.S. - Bisfi, District - Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ravindra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Khurshid Anwar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 28-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 08.11.2019 in connection with Bisfi P.S.Case No. 293 of 2019, corresponding to G.R. No. 1856 of 2019 for the alleged offences under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in connection with the alleged recovery of 216 litres of Nepali wine from a car in which three persons are alleged to have been travelling. The petitioner is said to have been identified by Chaukidar, but none of the persons were arrested from the spot. The petitioner was remanded in this case. The petitioner is accused in two prior cases in which he is on bail.

4. Be that as it may, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77326 of 2019(2) dt.28-11-2019 2/2 satisfaction of learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge-cumSpecial Judge, Excise Act, Madhubani in connection with Bisfi P.S.Case No. 293 of 2019, corresponding to G.R.No. 1856 of 2019 on the following conditions-- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (iv) The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) HR/- U T