← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./81087/2025allowed

Rinku Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2025-12-09Mr. Justice Harish Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.81087 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-445 Year-2025 Thana- GHOSI District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Rinku Devi Wife of Jayram Yadav R/o Village - Nagwan, P.S. - Ghosi, Dist. - Jehanbad.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Birendra Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 09-12-2025 Heard the learned Advocate for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends her arrest in connection with Ghosi P.S. Case No. 445 of 2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 303(2), 352 and 3(5) of the BNS.

3. The allegation against the petitioner is of causing assault upon the informant by means of iron khanti, due to which he sustained head injury. Besides the aforesaid allegation, the petitioner has also assaulted the son and daughter of the informant by means of brick.

4. Learned Advocate for the petitioner submitted that admittedly the parties are agnates, as is evident from the FIR itself. On account of a trifle, both the parties have entered into a scuffle resulting into some unfortunate injuries. Moreover, the injuries, which have been allegedly sustained to the informant and his son, both are found to be simple in nature. To support

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81087 of 2025(2) dt.09-12-2025 2/2 the aforesaid contention, the injury report of the informant and his son have been placed on record as Annexure-P/2 series. The petitioner is a woman, having fair antecedent, undertakes that she will fully co-operate in the proceeding of the Court.

5. On the other hand, learned Advocate for the State opposed the pre-arrest bail application.

6. Regard being had to the submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the fact that the petitioner is a woman, having fair antecedent, besides the simple nature of injury caused to the injured, let the petitioner above named be released on bail, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Jehanabad in connection with Ghosi P.S. Case No. 445 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 with the further condition that one of the bailors shall be the own/close family members of the petitioner.

(Harish Kumar, J) shivank/- U T