Sunil Yadav @ Sunil Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86361 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-297 Year-2024 Thana- RAHUI District- Nalanda ====================================================== Sunil Yadav @ Sunil Kumar S/o Kedar Yadav R/o Village- Dharmshi Bigha, PS- Rahui, District- Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

: Mr.Pramod Kumar Sinha, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Pawan Kumar Chaurasia, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 18-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Sessions Trial No. 837/2024 arising out of Rahui P.S. Case No. 297 of 2024 dated 07.06.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 304B read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and the co-accused persons are alleged to have assaulted and strangulated the informant's daughter to death due to non-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86361 of 2024(2) dt.18-01-2025 2/3 fulfillment of demand of Rs. 5,00,000/- and a Bullet motorcycle as dowry.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is the brother-in-law (bhaisur) of the deceased and he has no concern with the alleged offence. The petitioner neither demanded any dowry nor tortured the deceased. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. It is further submitted that the husband of the deceased is already in custody. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 22.06.2024.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Nalanda at Biharsharif in connection with Sessions Trial No. 837/2024

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86361 of 2024(2) dt.18-01-2025 3/3 arising out of Rahui P.S. Case No. 297 of 2024.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T