Ketan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.81631 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-30 Year-2025 Thana- GORAUL District- Vaishali ====================================================== Ketan Kumar Son of Awdhesh Singh Resident Of Village -Manjiya, Ps -Goraul, (Kathara OP), Dist -Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shivjee Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Abhay Kumar Roy, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 17-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 329(4), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of B.N.S., 2023 as well as Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on account of dispute of PACS Chairman (Ranjeet Singh) with her son Abhishek Kumar in a marriage, the accused persons came to her house looking for Abhishek, but he was not present thereafter accused left threatening and even fired in the air.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegations,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81631 of 2025(2) dt.17-02-2026 2/2 as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that the informant alleges that her son Abhishek had dispute with Ranjeet in a marriage on account of which the occurrence is alleged to have taken place. It is further submitted that even allegation of firing is general and omnibus in nature and no one was injured in the firing. It is next submitted that petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in the investigation to prove his innocence.

5. Learned APP opposes the anticipatory bail application.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, let petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Goraul P.S. Case No.30 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Sanjay/- U T