Patna High CourtCR. MISC./85135/2023allowed

Naveen Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-01-09Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85135 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-264 Year-2023 Thana- BALIYA District- Begusarai ====================================================== NAVEEN KUMAR S/O RAMESHWAR SINGH R/O VILLAGEBHARWAR, P.S- MUFASIL (LAKHO O.P.), DISTT.- BEGUSARAI. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bipin Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 09-01-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per prosecution case, some unknown miscreants, who are armed with weapon came on two motorcycles and snatched the mobile and motorcycle of the informant.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He has committed no offence. Petitioner is not named in the FIR and the same has been lodged against unknown persons. The name of the petitioner has come into light, on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Anshu Kumar, which has got no

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85135 of 2023(2) dt.09-01-2024 2/2 evidentiary value in the eyes of law. Nothing incriminating/looted articles have been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. No T.I. Parade has been done. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as stated in para3 of the bail petition. He is languishing in judicial custody since 19.10.2023.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Begusarai in connection with Balia P.S. Case No. 264 of 2023.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Arish/- U T