Kishore Yadav @ Jay Kishore Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88180 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-42 Year-1994 Thana- BARARI District- Katihar ====================================================== Kishore Yadav @ Jay Kishore Yadav Son of Uma Nath yadav Resident of Village- Ram Nagar, P.S.- Pipaiti, Distt.- Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Pramod Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Uday Pratap Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 11-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Uday Pratap Singh, learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Barari (Semapur) P.s. Case No.42 of 1994 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 447, 302, 201 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act.
3. The case of the prosecution is that altogether twenty named accused persons and twelve unknown persons riding on horse arrived and it is alleged that Mangal Yadav made fire which hit Kishor Mahto and Kishor Mahto died.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner. It has also been submitted that though petitioner has appeared at belated stage yet he is ready to cooperate with the trial and he shall be present on each and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88180 of 2024(3) dt.11-02-2025 2/2 every date before the trial court. There is nothing specific against the petitioner and petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 05.09.2024.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge-III, Katihar in connection with Barari (Semapur) P.s. Case No.42 of 1994, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall abide the undertaking. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Prakash Narayan U T