Ganesh Kumar Sah v. The State Of Bihar Through Chief Secretary, Government Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3040 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-0 Thana- District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Ganesh Kumar Sah S/o Ramashankar Sah R/o - Maranpur, P.S - Narayanpur, District - Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar 2.

The Principal Secretary, Home Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 3.

The Director General of Police, Patna, Bihar 4.

The Superintendent of Police, Bhojpur 5.

The Station House Officer, Narayanpur 6.

Brajesh Kumar N/A Resident of - Narayanpur, P.S - Narayanpur, District - Bhojpur ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rounak Sinha, Advocate For the State :

Mr. P.N. Sharma, AC to AG For the Respondent no.6:

Mr. Anand Vardhan, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD) 24-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent no.6.

2. Pursuant to our order dated 20.11.2025, the corpus has been produced. Learned A.C. to learned A.G. is also present.

3. This Court has interacted with the petitioner as well as the corpus and respondent no.6. The corpus namely Ujala Kumari, daughter of respondent no.6 has taken a stand that she does not want to go with the petitioner and she denies her marriage with the petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.3040 of 2025(3) dt.24-11-2025 2/2

4. On the other hand, claim of the petitioner is that corpus Ujala Kumari has been badly treated and tortured by her parents as a result whereof she has resiled from her stand.

5. In the circumstances, this Court is of the considered opinion that this writ application cannot succeed. We have repeatedly asked the corpus about her stand and she has reiterated every time that she is not willing to go with the petitioner.

6. In the circumstances, this writ application is found devoid of merit and is dismissed accordingly but with liberty to the petitioner to seek his remedy, if any, as may be advised to him in accordance with law.

7. We record that we have not gone into the merit of the contentions and the dismissal of the writ application shall not be taken as any opinion of this Court in any proceeding.

8. The corpus can go back with her parents who are present.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) (Sourendra Pandey, J) Rishi/- U