Anand Mohan Gautam v. The Union Of India

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3530 of 2023 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12805 of 2019 ====================================================== Anand Mohan Gautam S/o Chandrika Singh Resident of C/1, Housing Colony Kankarbagh P.S. Kankarbagh, Dist.-Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Union of India through Sri Giridhar Aramane, the Defence Secretary, Ministry of Defense, Govt. of South Block Central Secretariat New Delhi11. 2.

Smt. Jyoti Kapoor, The Defence Estate officer, J.O.B., Circle, Danapur Cantt. Danapur, Patna.

3.

Sri Sunil Srivastava, the Commandant, Station Head Quarter, OTA, Gaya. 4.

Sri Rajeev Ranjan, the District Forest Officer, Gaya. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Prabhat Ranjan Singh, Advocate For the NHAI :

Mr. Raghwanand, Advocate For the UOI : Mr. Kanak Verma, CGC ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI) Date : 06-03-2024 The present MJC is filed for non-compliance of the order dated 31.08.2022 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 12805/2019 the petitioner was directed to submit representation within a period of four weeks from 31.08.2022. In other words, the petitioner was required to submit representation on or before 30th, September, 2022. He had submitted representation on 30th, November, 2022. He has not made any efforts to file review petition in seeking extension of time. Therefore, question of entertaining the present

Patna High Court MJC No.3530 of 2023 dt.06-03-2024 2/2 contempt petition is not warranted due lapses on the part of petitioner, in so far complying directions of this court on his part. Accordingly, the present MJC contempt stands dismissed. Dismissal of present petition would not be a hurdle for the petitioner to approach the concerned authority if his grievance is still subsisting, in the light of belated submission of representation to the concerned authority. Authority is hereby directed to proceed in accordance with law at the earliest. (P. B. Bajanthri, J) ( Alok Kumar Pandey, J) amitkumar/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 16.03.2024 Transmission Date N/A