← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/16081/2018disposed

Baby Devi And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-04-10Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16081 of 2018 ====================================================== 1.

Baby Devi D/o-Ravindra Prasad Yadav, W/o-Brahamdeo Yadav, Resident of Village-Brondhiya, P.S.-Simultala, District-Jamui. 2.

Ram Ajit Yadav, Son of Baldeo Yadav, R/o Village- Charaiya, P.S.- Simultalla, Dist.-Jamui.

... ... Petitioners

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Food and Civil Supply, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3.

Collector, Jamui.

4.

District Supply Officer, Jamui.

5.

S.D.O. Jamui.

6.

Ajit Kumar Kushwaha S/o Nandlal Prasad Verma Resident of Village-Gadi Telwa P.S.-Simultala, District-Jamui.

7.

Mahadeo Mahto S/o Late Ramdas Mahto, Resident of Village-Gadi Telwa, P.S.-Simultala, Ditrict-Jamui.

8.

Vibha Raj D/.o Rajendra Prasad Sah, Resident of Village-Telwa Bazar, P.S.- Simultala, District-Jamui.

... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shruti Sinha For the Respondent/s :

Mr.S. Raza Ahmad- AAG5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 10-04-2019 At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners would be seeking their remedy in statutory appeal before the Collector, Jamui (respondent no. 3). Submission is that writ application may be disposed of with the liberty to the petitioners to seek their remedy in accordance with law.

Learned counsel for the State has no objection to the prayer of the petitioners.

Patna High Court CWJC No.16081 of 2018(3) dt.10-04-2019 2/2 In the aforesaid circumstances, let this writ application be disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to seek their remedy, if any available to them, in accordance with law. In case, such remedy applied for and a question of limitation arises, the same shall be considered keeping in mind that petitioners were pursuing their remedy before this court. This application stands disposed of accordingly. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Rajeev/- U