← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./81189/2025bail granted

Sumit Kumar @ Mukul Kumar @ Puchchi v. The State Of Bihar

2025-11-27Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.81189 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-9 Year-2025 Thana- KIUL RAIL P.S. District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== Sumit Kumar @ Mukul Kumar @ Puchchi S/o- Murari Saw Village- Purani Chhavi Ward No.18 PS- Barahiya Dist- Lakhisarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Parmanand Pd. Nr. Sahi , Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Aditya Narayan Singh 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 27-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State .

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 103 ( 2 ) and 61 ( 2 ) of BNS and 27 of Arms Act.

3 . The case of the prosecution , in short, is that, informant namely , Aarti Kumari alleged that on 21.01.2025 , her husband was going to village and after some time , informant got information that her husband has been shot dead. It is further alleged that all the F.I.R. named accused persons conspired with each other and committed murder of her husband to grab his land.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81189 of 2025(2) dt.27-11-2025 2/2 petitioner transpired during course of investigation on the basis of CCTv footage wherein this petitioner was seen fleeing away from the place of occurrence . Informant is not an eye witness to the alleged occurrence . Only vague suspicion has been raised against this petitioner and he has got no concern with the alleged occurrence . Petitioner is in custody since 21.04.2025 . 5 . Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts, materials available on record, period of custody and other circumstances of the case , the bail application is allowed. Let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned in connection with Kiul P. S. Case No. 09 of 2025 .

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Koushik/- U T