Rajnish Kumar @ Golu @ Khardushan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84550 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-397 Year-2022 Thana- SARAI District- Vaishali ====================================================== Rajnish Kumar @ Golu @ Khardushan Son of Shatrughan Thakur Resident of Village - Mani Bhakurahar, P.S. - Sarai, District - Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mritunjay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Madhuri Lata, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 24-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable u/s 341, 379, 504, 34 of IPC and 27 of Arms Act.

3.

As per prosecution case, petitioner along with one Deepu Kumar came to the informant and demanded rangdari of Rs.2 lakh by pointing pistol on informant's head. Thereafter, they snatched golden chain worth Rs.1 lakh from the neck of the informant and threatened him to kill on non-fulfillment of rangdari. 4.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR. No offence as alleged has ever taken place. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84550 of 2024(2) dt.24-01-2025 2/2 There is old enmity between the parties due to Panchayat election. The petitioner has five criminal antecedents as mentioned in para 3 of the bail application and has been languishing in custody since 23.08.2024.

5.

This is the second bail application for grant of bail of the petitioner. Earlier, the petitioner has filed Cr. Misc. No. 56583 of 2023 for grant of anticipatory bail of the petitioner and vide order dated 15.09.2023, the same was allowed with a direction to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner. On verification, it was found that the petitioner has four other criminal antecedents, which is now mentioned in para 3 of this bail application. 6.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail. 7.

Considering the facts and circumstances of this case and period of custody of the petitioner, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/the Successor Court, in connection with Sarai P.S. Case No. 397 of 2022.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) priyanka/- U T