Jai Ram Saw v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.81239 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-526 Year-2025 Thana- NAUBATPUR District- Patna ====================================================== Jai Ram Saw Son of Dukhan Saw Resident of Village- Rauniya, P.S.- Naubatpur, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Hansraj, ADvocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Sumiran Rai, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 03-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in connection with Naubatpur P.S. Case No. 526 of 2025 registered for the alleged offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 125(a), 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of B.N.S.

3. As per prosecution case, on dispute over drainage of dirty water, the petitioner and other co-accused resorted to brick batting and assaulted the informant and his family members with iron rod, lathi and danda causing a number of injuries to them.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is general and omnibus along with other co-accused persons. There is no specific allegation against the petitioner for causing any injury. The petitioner is an

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81239 of 2025(2) dt.03-12-2025 2/3 old man aged about 75 years. The prosecution case has been instituted after two days of occurrence, for which there is no explanation. The mother of the petitioner is very old aged about 95 years and she is seriously ill and nobody is available to take care of her except this petitioner. The petitioner has got clean antecedent. The petitioner in custody since 11.09.2025 and charge sheet has been submitted.

5. Learned APP opposes the submission made on behalf of the petitioner.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the fact that no specific overt act has been attributed to the petitioner and the injury report do not show any grievous injury of any of the victim and further considering the period of custody of the petitioner, his clean antecedent and submission of charge sheet, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VI, Danapur/concerned Court in connection with Naubatpur P.S. Case No. 526 of 2025, subject to the conditions mentioned in Section 480(3) of B.N.S.S. and also the following conditions :

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81239 of 2025(2) dt.03-12-2025 3/3 (i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and every date fixed by the court below.

(iii) In case of absence on three consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned.

(Arun Kumar Jha, J) DKS/- U T