Krishna Bhagwan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.78626 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-392 Year-2019 Thana- HAJIPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Krishna Bhagwan Son of Late Amod Kumar, Resident of Pokhara Mohalla Godri, Road, P.S.- Town, District- Vaishali.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Pramod Kumar Son of Late Dhunnu Prasad 3.
Sunil Kumar Son of Late Dhunnu Prasad 4.
Vinod Kuma Son of Late Dhunnu Prasad Opp.Party nos. 2-4 are resident of Pokhara Mahalla, Godri Road, P.S.- Town, District- Vaishali.
5.
Ravi Kumar Son of Vinod Kumar Resident of Godri road, P.S.- Town, District- Vaishali.
... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Rajeev Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Yogendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 17-02-2020 This application has been filed for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to Opp.Party no.2 to 5 by learned Xth Additional Sessions Judge, Vaishali at Hajipur in A.B.P. No.1657 of 2019 arising out of Hajipur Town P.S. Case No.392 of 2019 registered under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 120B of the Indian Penal Code.
Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that a forged compromise petition was filed in Partition Suit No.835 of 2013 in the court below, on the basis of which Opp.Party no.2 to 5 has tried to grab the land of the petitioner and also tried to kill
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78626 of 2019(2) dt.17-02-2020 2/2 him and they have caused loss of Rs.50 Lacs of his business. Heard learned A.P.P.
I have perused the impugned order granting bail to Opp.Party nos.2 to 5 and on perusal of the record as well as the impugned order, it is evident that the matter relates to civil dispute, which is pending before the court below. It is also evident that the petitioner has already filed a petition in Title Suit No.835 of 2013 pending in the court of learned Sub JudgeXIV in this regard. Considering the facts and circumstances , as stated above, I am not inclined to interfere with the impugned order. The application for cancellation of bail is dismissed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) nawalkrs/- U T