← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./81410/2025bail granted

Sanjeet Kumar Tatma @ Sanjit Kumar Tatma v. The State Of Bihar

2025-12-03Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.81410 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-326 Year-2017 Thana- TRIVENIGANJ District- Supaul ====================================================== Sanjeet Kumar Tatma @ Sanjit Kumar Tatma S/O Bisundev Tatma Resident of Village- Kathi Mohammadganj Ward No. 14, P.S- Chhatapur (Rajeshwari O.P.), District- Supaul.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kamal Kishore Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Amitesh Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 03-12-2025 Heard the parties.

2. The petitioner is in custody in connection with S.T. Case No. 191 of 2025 arising out of Triveniganj P.S. Case No. 326 of 2017 for the offence punishable under sections 341, 323, 308, 379, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that the accused persons called his grand son and later, allegation is that they surrounded and this petitioner gave blows on the head causing injuries. He was referred to Supaul Hospital and then to Darbhanga Hospital and finally to Patna. The accused also took away the ATM card/mobile. This led to the FIR.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has taken this

2/4 Court to the medical injury report (Annexure-2) to show that the same has been found to be simple in nature. He was in jail in connection with Chhatapur P.S. Case No. 154 of 2019 and as such, delayed coming into judicial custody in the present case, has remained in custody since 28.05.2025 and the last submission is that without accepting the allegation and/or the outcome of the present petition in view of the fact that the informant side has alleged injuries, the petitioner on its own would like to contribute towards the medical assistance of Rs. 5,000/- through Demand Draft issued by the local branch of the State Bank of India/any Nationalized Bank to be submitted before the 'NAZARAT' of concerned Court to be handed over to the injured after checking the credentials.

5. Learned APP opposes the prayer for bail submitting that the matter is of the year 2017.

6. Considering the submissions of the parties as also that the injury has been found to be simple in nature, has remained in custody since 28.05.2025, an undertaking has been given that he shall be diligently appearing in trial, in that background, this Court is inclined to extend him the privilege of bail with conditions subject to payment of Rs. 5,000/- to the injured as undertaken by the learned counsel for the petitioner to

3/4 be paid by Demand Draft of local branch of the State Bank of India/any Nationalized Bank to be submitted to the Trial Court.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Supaul in connection with S.T. Case No. 191 of 2025 arising out of Triveniganj P.S. Case No. 326 of 2017 subject to the following conditions:

(i) one of the bailor should be the family member/relative of the petitioner who shall provide official document to show his/her bona fide;

(ii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his bail bond by the Trial Court itself;

(iii) the petitioner shall appear before the concerned police station every fortnight for six months to mark his attendance and at the end of the period, the certificate be submitted to the Court;

(iv) the petitioner shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for

4/4 cancellation of the bail bonds;

(v) the petitioner shall desist from committing any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. (Rajiv Roy, J) Vijay Singh/- U T