← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./81413/2025dismissed

Mahendra Marandi v. The State Of Bihar

2026-01-16Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.81413 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-105 Year-2024 Thana- FALKA District- Katihar ====================================================== Mahendra Marandi S/O Late Parmeshwar Marandi R/O Vill.- Srikole, P.SFalka, Dist- Katihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pawan Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Binay Krishna ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 16-01-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

2. This is the 2nd attempt of the petitioner. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with S.Tr. No. 202 of 2025 arising out of Falka P.S. Case No. 105 of 2024 registered for the offence under Sections 363, 364, 365, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST Act and later on vide order dated 22.5.2024 Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code was also added.

3. Earlier the bail application of the petitioner was rejected on 15.05.2025 in Cr. Misc. No. 30610 of 2025, which reads as follows:- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81413 of 2025(2) dt.16-01-2026 2/3

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with S.Tr. No. 202 of 2025 arising out of Falka P.S. Case No. 105 of 2024 registered for the offence under Sections 363, 364, 365, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST Act and later on vide order dated 22.5.2024 Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code was also added.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is accused of killing the deceased.

4. The petitioner is named in the selfinculpatory statement of the co-accused as a participant of the killing the deceased.

5. The petitioner is in jail since 20.05.2024.

6. Considering the fact that the petitioner is involved in the killing of the deceased, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, this application is dismissed.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the charges have been framed on 27.05.2025 but no witness has been examined and therefore, the petitioner may be granted bail.

5. Considering the fact that trial has started, no ground for review is made out. Accordingly, this application for regular

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81413 of 2025(2) dt.16-01-2026 3/3 bail stands rejected.

6. The Superintendent of Police, Katihar is directed to ensure the attendance of the witnesses in the concerned court below.

7. Let a copy of this order be communicate through FAX/ e-mail to the Superintendent of Police, Katihar for its compliance.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) tusharika/- U T