Deepak Thakur @ Deepak Kumar Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88946 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-132 Year-2024 Thana- KARJAIN District- Supaul ====================================================== Deepak Thakur @ Deepak Kumar Thakur S/o Bantha Thakur @ Krishandev Thakur R/o vill - Padum Nagar, P.s. - Karjain, Distt.- Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Rani Kumari @ Babita Kumari D/o Sanjiv Ram R/o vill - Karjain, P.S. - Karjain, Distt.- Supaul ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bindeshwar Prasad Singh, Advocate For the State :

Mr.Binay Krishna, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 22-03-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Karjain P.S. Case No. 132 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 76, 78, 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita; Section 67 of the IT Act; Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(W) of the SC/ST Act and Section 8 of the POCSO Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is involved in forcible marriage of the boy.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. The petitioner is in jail since 09.09.2024 and claims clean antecedent.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88946 of 2024(3) dt.22-03-2025 2/2

5. Learned APP appearing for the State opposes the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge Exclusive POCSO Court, Supaul in connection with Karjain P.S. Case No. 132 of 2024.

7. The petitioner will also mark attendance in Karjain Police Station District- Supaul on the first Sunday of each month. Any default in appearance at the Police Station would be result in cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioner.

8. At the time of accepting bail bonds of the petitioner, the Court below will verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner. If it is found that the petitioner has criminal antecedent, the Court below shall not accept the bail bonds of the petitioner and if it is found that the petitioner has clean antecedent, his bail bonds shall be accepted by the Court below. (Sandeep Kumar, J) P. Kumar U T