Patna High CourtCR. MISC./85372/2024bail granted

Pintu @ Pintu Kumar Verma v. The State Of Bihar

2025-01-18Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85372 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-258 Year-2024 Thana- GOVINDPUR District- Nawada ====================================================== Pintu @ Pintu Kumar Verma Son of Siddheshwar @ Siddheshwar Mahto Resident of Village- Dilhua (Delua), P.S. - Govindpur, District- Nawada. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Man Mohan Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 18-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Govindpur P.S. Case No. 258 of 2024 dated 20.08.2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, when the informant went to his field, he came to know that his field was cultivated by his brother Sidheshwar. The informant narrated this incident to the villagers and upon this, it is alleged that the co-accused, Sidheshwar abused him and threatened to kill and also hit him

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85372 of 2024(2) dt.18-01-2025 2/3 on his head with an axe. It is further alleged that the petitioner hit the informant with an iron rod on his back and he fell down. It is further alleged that the co-accused person, Sidheshwar and his son Pintu (petitioner) threatened to kill them.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. There is no specific allegation against the petitioner and the petitioner was not present there at the time of occurrence. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged occurrence. The petitioner has two criminal antecedents as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 24.09.2024.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition of the petitioner and submitted that the injured Dhanpat Prasad sustained lacerated wound on the occipital region of head and the nature of injury is grievous.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Division

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85372 of 2024(2) dt.18-01-2025 3/3 Judicial Magistrate, Nawada in connection with Govindpur P.S. Case No. 258 of 2024.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) shivam/- U T