Abhijeet Kumar @ Golu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76572 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-619 Year-2019 Thana- MASAUDHI District- Patna ====================================================== ABHIJEET KUMAR @ GOLU S/o Dilip Kumar Jaiswal @ Dilip Prasad Jaiswal R/o village- Lakhibagh, P.S.- Masaurhi, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Santosh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Naresh Ray ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 18-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Masaurhi P.S. Case No. 619 of 2019 (Spl. No. 7489/2019) registered under Sections 30(a), 37(c) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no illicit liquor has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner and he has no criminal antecedent.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case wherein the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that there is no recovery of illicit liquor from the possession of this petitioner and that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, in the event of his arrest/surrender

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76572 of 2019(2) dt.18-12-2019 2/2 before the court below within a period of four weeks, let the above-named petitioner be enlarged on bail furnishing bail bond of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise, Patna, in connection with Masaurhi P.S. Case No. 619 of 2019 (Spl. No. 7489/2019), subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. i.e.

(i) a condition that the person shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

(ii) a condition that the person shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

(iii) a condition that the person shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Rajeev/- U T