Patna High CourtCR. MISC./83814/2025bail granted

Raman Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2025-11-28Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83814 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-51 Year-2025 Thana- Jhandapur District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Raman Paswan Son of Devo Paswan Resident of Village/Mohalla- Bind Toli Teentanga Karari, P.S.- Gopalpur, District- Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Baijnath Sah, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nand Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 28-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Jhandapur, P.S. Case No. 51 of 2025, instituted for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that total 61.125 liters of foreign liquor was recovered from the Tempo.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. Learned counsel

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83814 of 2025(2) dt.28-11-2025 2/3 for the petitioner submits that petitioner name has transpired as being owner of the seized vehicle, so far as recovery of liquor is concerned, the same is planted by the police party. The petitioner is in custody since 25.09.2025 and has got clean antecedent. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that other co-accused has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 05.08.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 51724 of 2025. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Jhandapur, P.S. Case No. 51 of 2025, subject to the following conditions: (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner.

(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83814 of 2025(2) dt.28-11-2025 3/3 fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) krishnakant/- U T