← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./84230/2025bail granted

Gajji Paswan @ Gajendra Paswan @ Ganji Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2025-12-23Mr. Justice Ajit Kumar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84230 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-340 Year-2025 Thana- CHANDI District- Nalanda ====================================================== Gajji Paswan @ Gajendra Paswan @ Ganji Paswan S/o Late Virjay Paswan, Resident of Village - Jagatpur, P.S. - Chandi, District - Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shyamal Prakash, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR ORAL ORDER 23-12-2025 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Chandi P.S. Case No. 340 of 2025, dated 01.07.2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 190, 191(1), 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352 and 351(2) read with Section 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that on 30.06.2025 at about 08:00 PM, the petitioner along with other co-accused persons came at the door of the informant and assaulted the informant and his family members.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case due to admitted land dispute between the parties. There is no specific allegation of assault against the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84230 of 2025(2) dt.23-12-2025 2/3 rather there is general and omnibus allegation against him. Both the parties are agnates. The injuries sustained by the injured persons is found to be simple in nature. Learned counsel lastly submits that petitioner has fair and clean antecedent.

5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that that there is no specific allegation of assault against this petitioner and further considering his clean antecedent, let the petitioner, abovenamed, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial Court within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt / production of a copy of this order, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial MagistrateI, Hilsa, Nalanda, in connection with Chandi P.S. Case No. 340 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. / Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., as well as on the following conditions:

(i) one of the bailors should be the family member / relative of the petitioner(s), who shall provide official document

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84230 of 2025(2) dt.23-12-2025 3/3 to show his / her bona fide;

(ii) the petitioner(s) shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his / her / their bail bond by the learned trial Court itself;

(iii) the petitioner(s) shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidence, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bond;

(iv) the petitioner(s) shall desist from committing any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of their bail bonds. (Ajit Kumar, J) Shahnawaz/- U T