Cholamandalam Ms General Insurance Company Limited, v. Sangita Devi,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Appeal No.922 of 2019 ====================================================== Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Company Limited, 2nd Floor, Dar House, 2NSC, Bose Road, Chennai, Appeal and Appellant through Assistant Manager / Authorized Signatory / Duly Constituted Attorney, Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Company Limited, 3rd Floor, IG Complex, Boring Canal Road, Patna- 1.
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
1.
Sangita Devi, wife of Late Dhirendra Jha, Resident of Village- Bhawanipur, P.S.- Rangra (Gopalpur) District- Bhagalpur.
2.
Preeti Kumari, (Minor), daughter of Late Dhirendra Jha, under the guardianship of mother, Respondent no. 1) Resident of Village- Bhawanipur, P.S.- Rangra (Gopalpur) District- Bhagalpur.
3.
Saurav Kumar Jha, (Minor) son of Late Dhirendra Jha, under the guardianship of mother, Respondent no. 1) Resident of Village- Bhawanipur, P.S.- Rangra (Gopalpur) District- Bhagalpur.
4.
Suchita Devi, wife of late Ravikant Choudhary, Resident of 103-Urmila Rita Apartment, Road No.-2, Rajbanshi Nagar, P.S.- Shastri Nagar, DistrictPatna. 5.
Sarhdeo Singh, son of Arjun Singh, Resident of Village- Laxmipur, Makadeep, Dighwara, District- Chapra.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s :
Mr. Durgesh Kumar Singh, Adv.
For the Respondent/s :
Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 17-10-2025 Heard the parties.
2. The present appeal has been preferred for the following relief(s):
Being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the judgment /award dated 08.06.2017, passed by Sri Sujeet Kumar Singh, Learned Additional District Judge-II, cum Motor Vehicle Accident Claim Tribunal,
Patna High Court MA No.922 of 2019(4) dt.17-10-2025 2/2 Naugachhia (here in after referred to as the Tribunal), in Claim Case no. 240 of 12 'Sangita Devi & others v/s Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Company Limited and others' by which compensation has been allowed against the appellant.
3. Mr. Durgesh Kumar Singh has prayed for withdrawal of the petition.
4. Accordingly, the same is dismissed as withdrawn.
5. The statutory amount, if any, has to be returned to the appellant.
(Rajiv Roy, J) Vijay Singh/- U