Nammi Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75919 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-72 Year-2019 Thana- KHAGAUL District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

Nammi Manjhi, Son of Late Bharat Manjhi, Resident of VillageNavratanpur, P.S.-Khagaul, Danapur and District-Patna. 2.

Sohray Manjhi, Son of Jitan Manjhi, Resident of Village-Navratanpur, P.S.- Khagaul, Danapur and District-Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bijay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Naresh Ray, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 26-11-2019 This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Khagaul P. S. Case No. 72 of 2019, disclosing offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

As per F.I.R. there is recovery of liquor from the houses of both the petitioners.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that he has falsely been implicated in this case, having no criminal antecedent.

Heard learned A.P.P. also, who has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail on the ground that there is recovery of liquor from their houses.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75919 of 2019(2) dt.26-11-2019 2/2 Having heard both sides, in view of the recovery of liquor from the houses of the petitioners, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. However, they have to surrender before the learned court below and make prayer for regular bail, which shall be considered by the learned trial court, on its own merit, without being prejudiced by order of this Court and if, possible to be disposed of on the same day. With the aforesaid, this application is dismissed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sunil Shukla/- U T