Bijay Bendre Jha @ Vijay Vendre Jha v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.955 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-508 Year-2023 Thana- AGAMKUAN District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

Bijay Bendre Jha @ Vijay Vendre Jha SON OF LATE JAIKANT JHA R/O VILLAGE- KUMHRAR, NEAR FOUNTAIN RESTAURANT, PSAGAMKUAN, DISTT- PATNA 2.

GAURAV KUMAR JHA SON OF BIJAY BENDRE JHA R/O VILLAGEKUMHRAR, NEAR FOUNTAIN RESTAURANT, PS- AGAMKUAN, DISTT- PATNA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

SWETA JHA WIFE OF CHANDAN JHA @ CHANDAN KUMAR JHA R/O VILLAGE- AMRIT HOSPITAL, SHIV DAYAL NAGAR, HARMU HOUSING COLONY, DELATOLI, RANCHI JHARKHAND ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ravi Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nagendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 31-01-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Agamkuan P.S. Case No. 508 of 2023, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307,354, 354(B), 427, 498(A), 504, 509/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per allegation, on return, the father-in-law of the informant was found in intoxicated condition and did not allow her to enter the house. It is further alleged that on intervention by the police, the informant was allowed to enter the house but no sooner did the police return from her house, she was ousted from her matrimonial house.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.955 of 2024(2) dt.31-01-2024 2/2

4. The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated merely because they are father and brother of husband of the informant. The husband of the informant has also lodged a case against the informant. On earlier occasion also, the informant has falsely implicated the petitioner in the cases with intention to harass them.

5. On the other hand, the learned APP has opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that the petitioners are admittedly, father-in-law and brother-in-law of the complainant and they are supposed to have no concern with day-to-day affairs of the couple.

6. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, especially the clean antecedent, let the petitioners, in the event of their arrest or surrender within four weeks before the learned court below, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IV, Patna City in connection with Agamkuan P.S. Case No. 508 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) Nirmal/- U T