← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./86594/2024allowed

Chinta Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2024-12-18Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86594 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-597 Year-2024 Thana- RAMKRISHNANAGAR District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

Chinta Devi Wife of Ram Babu Yadav @ Ram Babu Singh Village -Sheikhpura PS- Ram Krishna Nagar, District -Patna 2.

Mamta Devi Wife of Mithu Kumar Village -Sheikhpura PS- Ram Krishna Nagar, District -Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Krishna Pd. Singh, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Bhaskar Shankar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Mohammed Arif, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 18-12-2024 Heard learned Senior counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1), 61(2), 351(2), 3(5) of B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioners along with other co-accused persons and 5-6 unknown persons came at the house of the informant and fired from desi katta on the informant's husband, due to which he died on the way to hospital.

4. Learned Senior counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86594 of 2024(2) dt.18-12-2024 2/2 petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. He submits that the petitioners are female and there is no specific overt act against them. He further submits that there is specific allegation against co-accused Sonu Kumar, who fired upon the informant's husband. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes prayer for anticipatory bail.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that there is no specific overt act against the petitioners, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned lower Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Ramkrishna Nagar P.S. Case No.597 of 2024, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the B.N.S.S.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) anand/- U T