Jai Prakash Narayan @ Jai Prakash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85180 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-728 Year-2024 Thana- SASARAM NAGAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.

Jai Prakash Narayan @ Jai Prakash Kumar, Son of Mahendra Bind, Resident of Village- Magajpura, PS -Chenari, District -Rohtas 2.

Ram Pravesh Kumar, Son of Vijay Ram, Resident of Village -Tarachandi, PS -Darigaon, District -Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bhaskar Shankar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mohammed Arif, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 07-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners have prayed for bail in connection with Sasaram (T) P.S. Case No. 728 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 109 and 3(5) of B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that on 31.08.2024, the police received an information on mobile that certain persons have made firing near Chauk Bazar. The case was registered on 02.09.2024 against unknown persons.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85180 of 2024(2) dt.07-01-2025 2/2 committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this case due to village politics. The name of these petitioners surfaced on the basis of confidential information of spy. From perusal of the F.I.R., it is clear that no one was injured. Out of these petitioners, petitioner no. 1 is having criminal antecedent of one case whereas petitioner no.2 is having criminal antecedent of two cases and in those cases petitioners are on bail. Petitioners are in judicial custody since 03.09.2024.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Sasaram, Rohtas, in connection with Sasaram (T) P.S. Case No. 728 of 2024.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T