Md. Rabani, v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4822 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15958 of 2013 ====================================================== Md. Rabani, Male, aged about 65 years, son of Late Md. Taslim, resident of village- Chandrasenpur Block, Rahika, Police Station- Rahika, DistrictMadhubani. at present House No. F- 999, Indra Enclave Phase-2, Kirari Suleman Nagar Sultanpuri, Block-C, North West Delhi, Police Station- Prem Nagar-2, State Delhi.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar.
2.
Mr. Shrisht Kapil Ashok, son of not known, District Magistrate, Madhubani. 3.
Mr. Durga Nand Jha, son of not known, the Additional Collector, DistrictMadhubani. 4.
Mr. Sanjeev Ranjan, son of not known, the Circle Officer, Rahika, DistrictMadhubani. 5.
Noor Alam, son of Late Md. Akhtar, Resident of Village- Chandrasenpur, Police Station- Rahika, District- Madhubani.
6.
Zakara Khatoon, w/o Uma Hyat, resident of village- Chandrasenpur, Police Station- Rahika, District- Madhubani.
7.
Sharunisha, w/o Late Md. Khalik, resident of village- Chandrasenpur, Police Station- Rahika, District- Madhubani.
8.
Md. Zamil, son of Late Md. Khalik, resident of village- Chandrasenpur, Police Station- Rahika, District- Madhubani.
9.
Md. Nausad, son of Late Md. Khalik, resident of village- Chandrasenpur, Police Station- Rahika, District- Madhubani.
10.
Md. Sazzad, son of Late Md. Khalik, resident of village- Chandrasenpur, Police Station- Rahika, District- Madhubani.
11.
Md. Gulzar, son of Late Md. Khalik, resident of village- Chandrasenpur, Police Station- Rahika, District- Madhubani.
... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
None For the State :
Mr. Md. Khurshid Alam, A.A.G. 12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 26-07-2023 None appears for the petitioner. However, learned counsel for the State is present.
Patna High Court MJC No.4822 of 2019(2) dt.26-07-2023 2/2
2. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the State that a supplementary show cause has already been filed on behalf of the opposite party no. 2.
3. It has been submitted on behalf of the State that the order dated 09.01.2019, passed in C.W.J.C. No. 15958 of 2013, has already been complied with and a final order dated 01.02.2022 has already been passed, annexed as Annexure-1 to the supplementary show cause filed on behalf of the opposite party no. 2. Hence, no further order is required to be passed in the present contempt application.
4. Considering the fact that none is appearing on behalf of the petitioner, the present contempt application is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Sudhir Singh, J) U.K./- U T