Fanindra Kumar Verma And ANR v. The State Of Bihar Through Secretary General And Administrative Department, Government Of Bihar, Pa
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2939 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8982 of 2017 ====================================================== 1.
Fanindra Kumar Verma son of Late Shripati Prasad Verma, Resident of Village-Bankatwa, Babuitola, P.O.-Bagha, P.S.-Bagha, District- West Champaran.
2.
Raj Kumar Prasad Son of Late Lala Brij Nandan Prasad Sinha, Resident of Mohalla- Prithvipur 1st Street Chiraiyatand, Patna, P.O. - G.P.O., P.S.- Kankarbagh, District- Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through Secretary General and Administrative Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 2.
The Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna, Old Secretariat, Patna. 3.
Sri Sudhir Kumar, the Principal Secretary Agriculture Department, Govt. of BIhar, New Secretariat, 4.
Sri Sudhir Kumar, the Secretary Agriculture Department, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.
5.
Sri Aditya Narayan Rai, the Joint Agriculture Director Cum Controller Measurement and Weightage, Ra 6.
Sri Himanshu Kumar Rai, the Director Agriculture Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
7.
The Deputy Director Administration Agriculture Directorate Bihar, Patna. 8.
Assistant Controller, Measurement and Weightage, Rohtas, Sasaram. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Sunil Kumar No.III For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Raghwanand, GA- 11 Mr. Prabhat Kumar, A.C. to GA-XI ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 10-04-2019 The learned counsel for the contemner submits that the case of the petitioners has already been decided by order dated 06.03.2019 passed by the Director, Agriculture, Bihar, Patna and the benefits of first, second and third A.C.P. has already been granted.
Patna High Court MJC No.2939 of 2018(7) dt.10-04-2019 2/2 The learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the aforesaid contention of the learned counsel for the contemners, hence the contempt petition stands disposed off since the order of this Court has been complied with. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U