← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./82374/2019rejected

Bibi Gulista @ Resma v. The State Of Bihar

2020-06-01Mr. Justice Arvind Srivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82374 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-156 Year-2019 Thana- KASBA District- Purnia ====================================================== BIBI GULISTA @ RESMA W/o Late Md. Sanowar Resident of VillageDumri, P.S.- Kasba, District- Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ram Prawesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anant Kumar 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 01-06-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Kasba P.S. Case No. 156 of 2019 registered for the offence under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner, who is of clean antecedent, is innocent and has not committed any offence. In fact, the petitioner has not been named in the F.I.R. rather her name transpired in this case during course of the investigation. She has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 23.08.2019.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that the petitioner who happens to be second

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82374 of 2019(3) dt.01-06-2020 2/2 wife of the deceased has illicit relation with co-accused Maseek Alam and both of them have also confessed their involvement in the alleged crime. Moreover, prosecution witnesses have also supported the prosecution version which is evident from paragraphs 2, 8, 9, 24, 26, 27 and 50 of the case diary. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of this petitioner is rejected. (Arvind Srivastava, J) brajesh/- U T