Golu Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83456 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-209 Year-2025 Thana- SAHPUR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Golu Singh S/o Lallu Singh Resident of Village- Horil Chhapra, P.S.- Shyahpur, District- Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Raju Kumar Singh, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Syed Ehteshamuddin, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 23-12-2025 Heard the learned Advocate for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Shahpur P.S. Case No. 209 of 2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 109(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and 25(9) of the Arms Act.
3. The police in course of verification of a viral video where one person was found exhibiting firearms in his hand apprehended one Amarjeet Chaudhary @ Bui. The said person disclosed the name of the petitioner along with one Bhim Singh, who have provided him the pistol. In the aforesaid premise, the police conducted raid in the house of the petitioner and other accused, but both were found not present.
4. Learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83456 of 2025(2) dt.23-12-2025 2/3 save and except the disclosure made by co-accused Amarjeet Choudhary @ Bui, no material has been collected suggesting the complicity of the petitioner in the crime. The reason behind the false implication of the petitioner is nothing but two criminal antecedent in relation to Excise Act. Learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was neither found in the viral video nor any arms has been recovered from the whereabout of the petitioner. Moreover, the allegation is also omnibus in nature.
5. On the other hand, learned Advocate for the State opposed the pre-arrest bail application and submits that two criminal antecedent of the petitioner clearly speaks about his complicity in the crime.
6. Having considered the submissions advanced by learned Advocate for the respective parties and taking note of the materials available on record as well as the nature of allegation, besides the fact that nothing incriminating material has been recovered from his whereabout, let the petitioner above named be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83456 of 2025(2) dt.23-12-2025 3/3 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M. 1st, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Shahpur P.S. Case No. 209 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 with the further condition that one of the bailors shall be the own/close family members of the petitioner.
(Harish Kumar, J) shivank/- U T