← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/4828/2019dismissed

Sukeshwar Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2023-09-01Mr. Justice Harish Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4828 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12873 of 2016 ====================================================== Sukeshwar Ram Son of Late Sheetal Ram R/o Village- Sisua, P.O.- Betha, P.S.- Parihar, District- Sitamarhi.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Mr. R.K. Mahajan, the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

Mr. R.K. Mahajan, the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

Mr. Ajay Kumar Chaudhary, the Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

Mr. Abhilasha Sharma, the District Magistrate, Sitamarhi, DistrictSitamarhi. 5.

Mr. Ramchandra Mandal, the District Education Officer, Sitamarhi, DistrictSitamarhi. 6.

Mr. Shalendra Kumar, District Programme Officer, Establishment, Sitamarhi, District- Sitamarhi.

7.

Mr. Rupendra Kumar Jha, the Block Development Officer, Parihar, DistrictSitamarhi. 8.

Mr. Kishori Prasad Yadav, the Block Education Officer, Parihar, DistrictSitamarhi. 9.

Mrs Praween Khatoon, the Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj- Betha, BlockParihar, District- Sitamarhi. 10.

Mr. Devendra Sah, the Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj- Betha, Block- Parihar, Disrict- Sitamarhi.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mrityunjay Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Abhanjalli, AC to GA12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 01-09-2023 Both parties are present.

2. Mr. Mrityunjay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order of this Court dated 10.05.2018 has been fully complied with and, as such, he seeks permission

Patna High Court MJC No.4828 of 2019(3) dt.01-09-2023 2/2 to withdraw the present contempt application.

3. Learned counsel for the State has no objection.

4. In view of the submission made above, the present contempt application stands disposed of as withdrawn. (Harish Kumar, J) rohit/- U