Avinash Kumar Paswan v. The State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary, Government Of Bihar, Patna, Namely Mr. Deepak Kumar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3080 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19344 of 2017 ====================================================== Avinash Kumar Paswan Son of Vidyanand Paswan, Resident of VillageAurahi Nav Toli, P.S. Simraha, District-Araria. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary, Government Of Bihar, Patna, Namely Mr. Deepak Kumar Son of not Known to the Petitioner. 2.
The Commissioner, Purnea Division Purnea, Namely Mr. Safira Aik, Son of not Known to the Petitioners, 3.
The District Magistrate, Araria namely Himanshu Sharma, Son of not Known to the Petitioner.
4.
The Deputy Collector, Establishment, Araria, namely Sanjay Kumar, Son of not Known to the Petitioner.
5.
The District Welfare Officer, Araria, namely Mithilesh Kumar , Son of not Known to the Petitioners, 6.
The District Education Officer, Araria, namely Ashok KUmar Mishra, Son of not Known to the Petitioners, 7.
The District Land Agriculture Officer, Araria, namely Manoj Kumar, Son of not Known to the Petitioners, 8.
The District Fisheries Officer, Araria, namely Lal Bahadur Safi, Son of not Known to the Petitioners, 9.
The Executive Engineer, Public Health Division, Araria, namely Shankar Dayal, Son of not Known to the Petitioners, 10.
The Executive Engineer, Road Construction Department, Araria, namely Mr. Arvind Kumar, Son of not Known to the Petitioners, ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Rakesh Kumar Chandram For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Prabhat Kumar Verma - Aag 3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 03-04-2019 The opposite parties have filed a show cause stating therein that the District Establishment Committee under the Chairmanship of District Magistrate, Araria has passed a reasoned order dated 12.12.2018 pertaining to the case of the
Patna High Court MJC No.3080 of 2018(5) dt.03-04-2019 2/2 petitioner, hence the contempt proceeding be dropped. Per contra, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner be granted liberty to challenge the aforesaid order dated 12.12.2018.
Having considered the submissions of both the parties, the present contempt petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the order of the dated 12.12.2018. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) rinkee/- U