Lav Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88981 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-108 Year-2024 Thana- Kharagpur District- Munger ====================================================== 1.

Lav Kumar Son of Ram Mandal Resident of Village - Khaira, P.S. - Haveli Kharagpur, District - Munger 2.

Sachin Kumar Son of Arun Mandal Resident of Village - Khaira, P.S. - Haveli Kharagpur, District - Munger 3.

Manish Kumar Son of Arun Mandal Resident of Village - Khaira, P.S. - Haveli Kharagpur, District - Munger ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kumar Kamal Nayan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dilip Kr. No.1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 06-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Dilip Kr. No.1, learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioners seek bail in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable u/s 147, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 504, 506, 385 of IPC.

3.

As per FIR, the petitioners along with other co-accused persons are said to have assaulted the informant and his family members by means of iron rod due to which they sustained injuries.

4.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have not committed any

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88981 of 2024(2) dt.06-02-2025 2/2 offence as alleged in the FIR. No offence as alleged has ever taken place. They have been falsely implicated in this case due to dirty village politics, malice and grudge. Injury on the body of informant's son was found to be grievous in nature. There is no specific overt act attributed against the petitioners. The petitioners have no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para 3 of the bail application and have been languishing in custody since 30.09.2024.

5.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail. 6.

Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, period of custody of the petitioners, their clean antecedent and the fact that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners, the above named petitioners is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/the Successor Court, in connection with Haveli Kharagpur P.S. Case No. 108 of 2024.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) priyanka/- U T