Sajan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82201 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-90 Year-2025 Thana- BELDOUR District- Khagaria ====================================================== Sajan Kumar S/O Suresh Singh R/O Village- Kurban, P.S.- Beldaur, Distt.- Khagaria ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ranjeet Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Umeshanand Pandit, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 13-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Perused the case diary.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Beldaur P.S. Case No. 90 of 2025, instituted for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and under Section 25(1-B)(a) and 26 of the Arms Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that total 37.14 liters liquor, gas cylinder, regulator, 26 live cartridges and two country made pistol were recovered from the house of the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82201 of 2025(4) dt.13-03-2026 2/3 the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that the alleged recovery of liquor and country made pistol along with cartridges have been made from joint house of the petitioner, where other family members also reside. The name of the petitioner has been disclosed by the local Chowkidar. The petitioner is in custody since 04.09.2025 and has got three criminal antecedents. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail, after framing of charge, if not already framed, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Beldaur P.S. Case No. 90 of 2025, subject to the following conditions:

(I) One of the bailors shall be the petitioner's own or

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82201 of 2025(4) dt.13-03-2026 3/3 close member.

(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed during the trial and shall not remain absent on two consecutive dates without sufficient cause.

(III) The petitioner shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence or influence/intimidate any witness during the course of trial.

In case of violation of any of the aforesaid conditions, the Trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) manish/- U T